I have to agree... MANY businesses involve situations where very high percentages of the man-hours worked cannot be directly charged to a client or attributed to a singular job or product. Video production - Only 10%-15% is spent actually filming or editing material... Indeed one of the things we teach students studying (programme) Production Management is that there is no such thing as free time - all business/work related activities, however minor, percolate through to the final invoice even if they can't be itemised...Andrew;26360 wrote:Have you gone to a Solicitor/Accountant at all to ask their advice. I know it is more money but surely it can't be correct or legal on what they are trying to claim.
Whether these things are profitable or not is another matter!
This is where time-and-motion studies pay dividends. - It's surprising how labout costs per product spiral when you actually DO take into account not only the primary and secondary but tertiary activities that go into getting a product onto the shelf!
...As I said previously; I know for a fact one DHSS tactic was to deny people things they were fully entitled to knowing that a proportion would simply 'fold' at the first hurdle. - More often than not deciscions given to claiments were in spectacular breach of the law, and collapsed under review. - But by that means they could massage their P.I.s - And in fact many of the statistic you hear about 'Benefit Cheats' are generated by extrapolating this sort of nefariously inaccurate data!
- The people you are dealing with ARE ex DHSS - And from a section that is legend for its spectacular incompetence. My instinct is that they are trying it on - And they DON'T have the last word! though they crack-on otherwise!
You need someone with professional experience to guide you. Advice from forums, neighbours etc is all very well; even if they do have some background knowledge - But this is a case of fold or get the proper help and advice.
