pitkin2020;29021 wrote:Nice info JSR i have learnt something tonight. I take in reality setting the correct profile for a printer would be a but fruitless if your monitor isn't calibrated aswell as the colours from screen to print are going to vary?
Well, not "fruitless" exactly because, without a correction profile, you could end up printing anything. At least the printer profile will ensure that what you print is reasonably accurate - even if it doesn't match your uncalibrated monitor.
You need a good monitor to profile it well enough to use. I'm still using an old Philips 19" LCD panel which, although I've created a profile for it, it's unable to be really accurate with what it's displaying. As soon as I have the funds, I'll be replacing it with an IPS model (more expensive but apparently capable of producing more colours).
Having someone else provide you with a profile (which is what happens with the "authorised" printer/ink in the dye-sub industry, or if you use someone else's custom profile) is like having to accept that "close enough is good enough". I used to use the profiles provided with the approved/authorised ink for the printers I was using (Epson 1400), but I rarely got anything accurate. In the days of the Epson 1290S, I had to desaturate the print a lot to get close. With the Epson 1400, the v1 profile worked on my older printer but was hideous with the newer one while the newer v2.5 profile was okay with the new printer but hideous with the older one. Despite having two of the same "supported" printer using the same "authorised" ink, I had to use two different profiles - that shows you how inaccurate profiles provided by others can be.
I used the provided profile for a "supported" Epson B40W with "authorised" ink but the result was a hideous green cast - this was clearly a fault with the printer but, because the profile had been produced on some other version of the B40W, it was useless for my purposes. As soon as I created a custom profile, the green cast was gone and it printed fine.
Just recently I had cause to print numerous greyscale images (they had spot colours in them so I had to use all the colour inks - I couldn't just use the black). Even with a custom profile, the greys had a slight colour cast to them. It wasn't much, and it was still much more neutral than the provided profiles with "authorised" systems that I'd used in the past, but it wasn't good enough for my increasingly high standards. Fortunately, I had my colour-profiling device (ColorMunki Photo). With that you're able to read off the RGB/CMYK values of a specific colour in your printed image so that you can correct it. Using this, I achieved a neutral greyscale for the first time in years - I'd always believed that it was an impossibility to get a good grey from dye-sub inks, but it turns out that it's all about the profile provided by the ink manufacturer just not being accurate enough.
In short, a profile that's provided for your brand/model of printer/ink/substrate will get you "close enough" for most prints (particularly if you're printing bright/high-colour photos). A custom-profile for your precise printer/ink/substrate combination will get you much closer. And having your own profiling device allows you to get spot-on. It all comes down to where you want to spend your money.
I used to spend £300 on what I thought was the best printer (Epson 1400 because it's A3 and has 6 inks) that was "supported" by the "authorised" dye-sub ink manufacturer. For years I've been putting up with "close enough is good enough" and always hating it when I couldn't get neutral greyscales or accurate colours. Today, I've stopped spending £300 on printers. Instead, I spent the last £300 on the profiling device and now I use £60/£100 printers with just 4 inks - because, with the ability to profile/tweak/spot-scan, four inks is more than enough.
I've come to the conclusion that spending lots of money on a printer just because it's "supported" with a profile is like the tail wagging the dog. The correct way to work is to be able to create your own profiles first, and then you pick which printer best suits your particular application. This way, you're using the best printer for the job - you're not forced into using an unsuitable printer just because there happens to be a profile for it provided by the ink manufacturer.
Sorry for waffling so much, but being able to produce my own profiles has simplified my workflow, decreased stress, and made me a much happier bunny. (And it's all thanks to forum member Paul who first introduced me to his ColorMunki!)