Firstly, I am personally not entrenched in my beliefs, however THE REAL TRUE FACTS (to coin a phrase) does make me think I am on the right side of science with this one. You only have to do a search for www.thedailyexpose.co.uk on FULL FACT to realise that particular website is not exactly a trusted source.
I do not buy into the claim that the world's media has been silenced. It is simply not possible to do this anymore. You only have to look at Super Injunctions to understand that. I could accept that some governments have silenced their media, but not the entire world. That is impossible to do meaning if there were some alternative views that carried some weight we would know about it through our own media.
I can not think of anyone who doubts that the government sent untested elderly back into care homes (it was even reported in trusted news sources) and no doubt there will be more to come on this, but you then go on to suggest that the government (presumably in cohorts with a medical doctor) has set about killing off the elderly on a UK wide scale. Again, that is simply not true and there will be zero evidence to back up that claim.
With regards to the specific case of Maddie de Garay, while very tragic it is ultra rare. I do not make light of her situation, but as a society we have to accept that no vaccine will be 100% effective for everyone and sadly there will be very few who will suffer severe side effects from it. It is one of the reasons why I firmly believe it should be freedom of choice as to whether you want the vaccine or not.
Cover your Snout - or Stay Out
-
socialgiraffe
- Posts: 4597
- Joined: 16 Jun 2011, 23:40
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
-
socialgiraffe
- Posts: 4597
- Joined: 16 Jun 2011, 23:40
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Cover your Snout - or Stay Out
BTW, there are never two sides to science. One is correct and one is wrongI know there are two sides to this whole 'Pandemc'
USING: Whatever it takes to get the job done...
Re: Cover your Snout - or Stay Out
I don't think that the effectiveness of a properly worn CE marked surgical mask is even open for debate.
Face coverings are a different matter. Prior to the start of the pandemic any mask designed to provide protection to the wearer was classed as PPE and had to be CE marked. Due to a shortage of PPE the catagory of 'face covering' was introduced. Far less effective, but better than nothing.
I wouldn't get involved with mask (face covering) printing during the pandemic (aside from one customer), but I sold plenty of CE marked masks at cost to my customers.
Face coverings are a different matter. Prior to the start of the pandemic any mask designed to provide protection to the wearer was classed as PPE and had to be CE marked. Due to a shortage of PPE the catagory of 'face covering' was introduced. Far less effective, but better than nothing.
I wouldn't get involved with mask (face covering) printing during the pandemic (aside from one customer), but I sold plenty of CE marked masks at cost to my customers.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
