Page 1 of 1

Re: Versacam Users With White Ink Configuration

Posted: 24 Nov 2015, 15:37
by socialgiraffe
Hi Guys

Sorry not sublimation but I know a few of you have Versacam's on here.

Just wondering if those who have a white configuration Roland have upgraded to the Ecosol White 2 and if so is there any difference? Thinking of downgrading/upgrading and just wondered if its worth keeping the white or switching to another Lightbox UV version.

Any opinions would be appreciated.

Re: Versacam Users With White Ink Configuration

Posted: 24 Nov 2015, 15:57
by Quinsfan
Nothing to do with the post sorry, just want to keep it on my subscribed list so i get any updates.

Re: Versacam Users With White Ink Configuration

Posted: 24 Nov 2015, 17:17
by ArferMo
Not bothered upgrading as I don't use the white much and didn't want to waste a LOAD of ink. I have a couple of carts left.

It's supposed to be better scratch resistant and longer UV life. Only real reason for me to upgrade is if I was printing for school or medical environment to meet new legislation for heavy metals.

Re: Versacam Users With White Ink Configuration

Posted: 24 Nov 2015, 21:10
by socialgiraffe
I thought it also had better viscosity for "backing up" not sure if that is correct though.

Re: Versacam Users With White Ink Configuration

Posted: 24 Nov 2015, 21:56
by ArferMo
All sorts of enticing claims to make you sling valuable ink.

Not long after they announced max2 white than along comes max3.