Stitch Up wrote:If you go down the route of laser sub printing of mugs you'll probably look at the final result and think; "Hmmmmm, I'm impressed". Then, like us you'll print several hundreds or maybe even 1000s.
Then one day you go to one of the trade shows and visit the Novechrome or Xpres stands. There, you'll witness the creation of dye-sub mugs, plates etc etc and you'll think; "Hmmmmm, mine are crap".
Believe me, laser sub'd mugs are crap when sat alongside dye-sub mugs.
And yes, laser sub'd mugs do scratch too, maybe not immediately, but after a while they look even crappier

Hi Stich,
When you say "laser sub" are you talking about the same process that i am using?
Dye sublimation, as i am sure everyone here knows , is the process whereby the ink on your transfer is converted directly to a gas with no liquid stage. It then permeates the "coating " on the mug to produce the image.
Laser transfer however is the process where the toner is deposited on a specially formulated paper which allows the toner to release when heated and attach to the surface of the mug. The "glazing" process i talk of is when the toner is then heated at a high temp to allow it to bond to the new surface properly, a by product of this is that is becomes glossy.
Theoretically if you could build a printer that used mugs instead of paper, you could print directly onto the mug.
I personally have no favorite except that i found that it was cheaper and more cost effective for me to go down the laser route. With respect to quality and price, i have found that the mugs i produce are as good as any dye sub mug i have seen and when a customer holds both types in their hand, they really don't care how it was produced, as long as its what they want.
If a business buys a hundred mugs , they will only look at the cost, as long as it looks good. If an individual buys a mug they will either treasure it, so it will always look good or they will use it , in which case they will probably break it before the quality of the process used to make it will become an issue.
If however I wished to produce works of ceramic art, I would be a potter and i wouldn't use either method.
Each one of us has their own favorite method and i do realise that this forum is a dye sub forum I just happen to like being able to buy readily available toner and transfer paper then produce 3000 pages before i have to buy more.
mik