Page 4 of 5

Re: Looks like we will be giving up press on heat transfers altogether

Posted: 10 Jan 2014, 23:00
by rossdv8
Thanks Ali,

Sometimes I feel this project is a waste of time, then I see the one shirt that worked perfectly, and realise it is:
1 - the challenge of doing this again
2 - the realisation that I was so stupid as to not document exactly what I was doing with each trial.

I just never expected it to succeed - ever.

Also, sometimes I get the feeling people here think I am trying to sell something. I'm not. Something I did worked, and worked so well it has become my favourite shirt. If I can do it, someone else will. I'm far too old to do this with the idea of making my fortune.

The orange sunset shirt that pops up in my posts, has been washed over 100 times now, and after the first wash there was no feel of anything in the shirt. But I cannot remember exactly what I used.

I used a clear spray product on at least a couple of the shirts. It is a solvent based urethane spray for protecting art work and I wrote about that somewhere.
I used another similar spray product when I could not get my usual one.
These things dry so fast I usually refer to them as a 'dry saturation' even though they go on wet, to differentiate between the other products that are water based.
I also used several water based urethanes.
In one of them I added something that more or less 'set' the water based product and cross linked the urethane, as a catalyst would, but without making it hard like a plastic coating. On that shirt, the lint balled up after pressing and a few washes and I spent a day scraping the balls of lint off the cotton with a razor blade, damaging the cotton fibres in the process.
However, that one is the other shirt that I cannot wash any of the colour out of.

So my recent experiments have been to try to find out what I did. But the thing that has be baffled is why one of the two shirts where nothing at all washes out the colour, did not have the lint balls.

I remember remarking at the time that if it worked in the long run, the process would not be commercially viable because it would involve washing the shirt before a customer got it. I've since discovered that pre washed is not a problem. And people are quite happy to have the shirts I am doing now, but I know they will not be completely permanent like the orange one.

While I've been writing this, I just pulled a load of washing that includes the last few shirts I showed on this thread and they were washed in a mixed load for 40 minutes. When I wash them I mark the number of washed. One is now up to 8, one is at 4 and one is at 5, and all are retaining colour ok. But one, oddly enough, the one at 4 cycles, seems a little lighter than it was, so there is still something not right.

All of these are with the water based urethane, and NO cross linking catalyst. And they were all air dried. I recall doing some of the early stuff putting the saturated shirts on the press and drying them under pressure. As the water based urethanes are a heat set polymer, I wonder if this is part of what I forgot.

At the moment, you can buy a product to spray or screen onto the cotton shirt, then sublimate it. As I have said before, that is the same as sublimating an aluminium plate or a ceramic mug. In cotton shirt terms, it is really not much different than a normal heat transfer, but there's no messy peeling. It works, it is proven, and it is freely available from companies like Flying Sublimation (if you speak Chinese).

It still has the limitation of heat transfer and DTG, there is 'hand'. You can feel it, and it can wear off. But it is current technology and it works.

What I did, and want to achieve again, is to get the process all through the cotton, not on the surface. That's all I am trying to do. For us here though, most of our cotton shirts suffer a hard live and get dirty easily. So we are now making ALL our cotton shirts using the saturation process, knowing we'll get 20-25 washes.

But I still want that permanent process again :-)

I'll post more pics around 15 washes. If the designs can still be seen clearly I will post at 20. But I will keep trying to find what I did on that damned orange sunset shirt..

Re: Looks like we will be giving up press on heat transfers altogether

Posted: 10 Jan 2014, 23:15
by rossdv8
I guess it is really about the 'no hand' thing, and about dying into the shirt rather than putting a print on the shirt. And about having another product to offer low volume 'tourist' customers who just want a souvenir that is different.
Right now though I'm about to wear that orange sunset shirt to town - again :-)

Re: Looks like we will be giving up press on heat transfers altogether

Posted: 10 Jan 2014, 23:30
by NikGrey
Don't worry about how you 'Perceive' people are thinking about you - I mix with some, well let's just say 'Interesting Characters' and they are much like you (and me) in the way we see things:
I recall doing some of the early stuff putting the saturated shirts on the press and drying them under pressure.
That is something I would do, as a test. 95% of the things I have done were futile but I have had obviously 5% success and it takes only One thing to change current thinking.

Keep experimenting (I know you will) and posting here as some of us really do appreciate what you are doing.

Re: Looks like we will be giving up press on heat transfers altogether

Posted: 10 Jan 2014, 23:59
by rossdv8
Thanks Nik,

Sometimes I wonder, but then someone who is genuinely curious replies and makes it fun again. I'm lucky. At my age this is playing with supplementary income. I'm not interested in making more than $1,000 a week from a retirement hobby. :-)

At the other end of the scale, if I'm feeling a little annoyed at what I'm doing, I read one of pisquee's comments and they so often sound completely negative. Then I realise he and a couple of others are playing devil's advocate and that makes me look seriously at it all again.

Tha hard part is getting over the whole argument that you can;t sublimate on 100% cotton. I always counter with the fact that you can;t sublimate on 100% aluminiumm or 100% ceramic either. But if you treat either of those substrates, you can sublimate. What is the difference between treating a mug, an aluminium plate, or a cotton shirt? A coating is appled to accept the siblimation dye.

All I did, and am trying to achieve again, was to put the coating inside the cotton instead of on it. That was the easy part. The hard part, and what I can;t remember, is what I did to stop it washing out again.

If I am happy with hand on my shirts though I can just use the coating on the shirt and sublimate that. Heat transfers stick on a shirt. Poly can also stick on a shirt.

Anyway, I just checked the 3 shirts in the dryer and all look fine. No obvious fading.

Did you have a look at that sub print on canvas that I posted? The one on the cheap pre-stretched canvas? If you are curious PM me and I'd like to chat with you about it because the canvasses are what got me started on all this stuff over a year ago. There's a whole other market out there for those.

Re: Looks like we will be giving up press on heat transfers altogether

Posted: 11 Jan 2014, 00:12
by NikGrey
I know what you mean about "Counter Comments' - I was watching this forum for a while before deciding to join in. Everyone here (from what I can tell) are genuinely interested in furthering ALL of our business, there is (at the moment) more than enough business for us all and that is One of the reasons I enjoy this part of my life.

To be honest, as I have had so many problems (with Developers) I have had to do other things whilst waiting to open, projects to get my mind off of this so probably did see your Canvas but can't remember.

I will PM you now as I am genuinely interested in what you are doing.

We are never fully Sublimating anything, as far as I can tell we are only ever sublimating a 'Coating' - and this is something I want to make easier for everyone if I can help in any way.

Re: Looks like we will be giving up press on heat transfers altogether

Posted: 11 Jan 2014, 00:38
by rossdv8
We are never fully Sublimating anything, as far as I can tell we are only ever sublimating a 'Coating'
Except that on polyester shirts, and plastic products (I do polysub mugs) and mouse pads etc, which are polyester. In the case of mouse pads we're sublimating the article, but instead of coating it, a backing is added.

Nik, there is a pic of a print on a pre-stretched canvas in this thread, Page 2, Post #16. Ignore the dark colour, it was a sunset and I wanted the stormy look. You get that by adding 10 seconds or so to the press time, but it wasn't a great idea. Next time I'll get the effect with a photoshop type program.

Re: Looks like we will be giving up press on heat transfers altogether

Posted: 11 Jan 2014, 01:04
by Ali P
Your efforts ARE appreciated - my dad used to say to me many years ago "If at first you don't succeed, try and try again" which is something that used to annoy me as a youngster but life teaches you how true it is! Tomorrow (good grief look at the time, I should say later today) I will try and speak with a friend of mine whose business is injection molding (he has a wealth of information on plastics) and see if he can suggest anything that would help - the science behind the polymer.....maybe the missing link....! Good night all :)

Re: Looks like we will be giving up press on heat transfers altogether

Posted: 11 Jan 2014, 09:17
by DS Designs
I too am following this with interest, I've no doubt it can (an was) achieved and can be again when you remember how you did it :) ....Good luck with the experiments..please keep us updated with the progress :)

Re: Looks like we will be giving up press on heat transfers altogether

Posted: 21 Jan 2014, 05:49
by rossdv8
Ok, this is the latest sub on cotton. I narrowed it down to four products I had used with some success, three of which worked fairly well but I cannot remember what I used to activate one of them. Out of the other two, one seems to be pretty well bullet proof, and I'm concentrating most of my wash and wear tests on that. The problem is that supply of that product is patchy at best.

I tried a number of so called 'picture varnishes' that are supposed to be clear, but they leave a yellowish border, even the ones that say 'non yellowing'.

I have been testing another more commonly available product that, as you can see in this pic of my latest shirt, does now have a yellow overspray.

This product works the same way as the one I had best results with, but I don;t think it holds the dye as well, although a shirt done with a quick application of this stuff seems to be reasonable after a few washes in very, very hot water with Dynamo detergent.

I'll treat this one with a bit more respect because I rather like the way it turned out.

As always, there are no ICC profiles used, so people's skin might look a bit odd. The pic is cropped out of a larger image so resolution is not great.

And of course, it IS cotton, so you don;t get the lovely vibrant colours of polyester.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]2383[/ATTACH]

Re: Looks like we will be giving up press on heat transfers altogether

Posted: 21 Jan 2014, 05:55
by rossdv8
Here's the 'old poster' shirt after a few more washes. This is done with the product I think I will stick with. Still waiting on approval to buy in bulk, which will make it not much dearer to print than JetPro. I should add that it is wet in this pic. It gets light and covered by a soft down when dry.
Wet, it shows that the colours are not washing out or fading. Dry it looks 'distressed'.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]2384[/ATTACH]