Re: Buying inks.
Posted: 14 Jun 2012, 20:35
In big business/multinational/corporate land it's all about money, not who's right or wrong. So, when big businesses like BASF and FUJI make their own sublimation inks, is the cheaper option to go through a lengthy and very expensive IP legal battle in multiple territories, or just pay Sawgrass a license fee?
As part of the TOG settlement, there was an agreement that no-one from TOG or related parties would be allowed to share any information which would/could be used in future legal action against Sawgrass.
TOG were not big enough financially to go all the way through with the battle, and it is a shame, but in the court notes I read, the court had ruled that TOG were not infringing as no enforcing agent was necessary or used in TOG's formulation.
Sawgrass basically seem to be bullies - they say: we have a patent, so do what we say or we will sue you. Most people/companies go along with this, and either out of fear stop doing what they were doing (hence non-licensed Ebay sales dissappearing very quickly), or weigh up the pros and cons and pay the license fee
As part of the TOG settlement, there was an agreement that no-one from TOG or related parties would be allowed to share any information which would/could be used in future legal action against Sawgrass.
TOG were not big enough financially to go all the way through with the battle, and it is a shame, but in the court notes I read, the court had ruled that TOG were not infringing as no enforcing agent was necessary or used in TOG's formulation.
Sawgrass basically seem to be bullies - they say: we have a patent, so do what we say or we will sue you. Most people/companies go along with this, and either out of fear stop doing what they were doing (hence non-licensed Ebay sales dissappearing very quickly), or weigh up the pros and cons and pay the license fee