Everyone always uses car analogies..! :biggrin:Paul;35011 wrote:i see this in bit different light
is like a car... car is discovered for taking you froma place A to place Bbut this days when buying a car most people would not even think that car has not stero, air con, head rest and other unneded bits
same with windows.
In this instance, though, the stereo, the air con, the head rest, etc are what would be additional software installed onto your computer. The car is the hardware, the controls are Windows, anything else is software.
Using your analogy, bloated Windows is like being told that you have to upgrade your unsupported car because all cars must come with a stereo that pumps out 30,000 Watts through several 7ft speakers. In order to continue driving your car, you need to have that stereo, therefore you need a car that has the space for it and the capacity to power it.
The operating system should only be there to enable the software to talk to the hardware - i.e., making the system operate. That's the definition of an operating system. Any other bells and whistles is additional software that you install if and when you need it - it's your choice. Being forced to upgrade your Operating System because the older version is no longer supported, and then being forced to upgrade your hardware because the new OS won't run on the old hardware specs, is the tail wagging the dog. Software required to perform your chosen task should dictate your hardware, not the OS.
It's a concern because we shouldn't have to fill up landfill sites with perfectly serviceable computers just because the OS has become too bloated to support it. The operating system should just be the operating system.Paul;35011 wrote:Guys. we have fgaster cars, trains. we landed on moon (486 dx2would do this job) we can travel the world in couple of hours by plain etc... sowhy in this age speed of the procesors, ram and waight of the windows is such a concern??
