Ready to start mug smashing!

Specifically for mug presses & ovens
User avatar
Squadron Prints
Posts: 73
Joined: 09 Dec 2010, 09:31
Contact:

Re: Ready to start mug smashing!

Post by Squadron Prints »

OK but being photographers there is a difference between quality of PPI and dpi - I won't argue!
Matt Quinn
Posts: 214
Joined: 27 Apr 2011, 19:30
Contact:

Re: Ready to start mug smashing!

Post by Matt Quinn »

Squadron Prints;25811 wrote:OK but being photographers there is a difference between quality of PPI and dpi - I won't argue!
...I'm glad you said that. :biggrin: My tongue's sore biting it... :biggrin:
AdamB
Posts: 2044
Joined: 10 May 2010, 10:00
Contact:

Re: Ready to start mug smashing!

Post by AdamB »

Ah, the old 'DPI' and 'PPI' ............... for those interested, please see the info below (sourced so I wouldn't have to type it all):

DPI and PPI Explained


There seems to be a great deal of confusion among many people regarding the use of some terms in digital imaging. One of the more common sources of confusion is the difference between DPI and PPI. The main problem with this is that DPI (dots per inch) is an old term that has been applied to everything relating to resolution and the size of a digital image. This is very confusing because different situations work with resolution in very different ways, and having a single term for all of them just makes things more confusing. More recently, the term PPI (pixels per inch) has appeared in common usage and is far more specific for what the term entails. DPI is still used in some documents and software when PPI is really what they mean, but this is changing. This article is an attempt to explain what the 2 terms mean and how they should be used.

PPI

Let’s start with PPI, it’s easy to understand. This is the number of pixels per inch in your image. This will affect the print size of your photo and will affect the quality of the output. The way that it will affect the quality of the output is that if there are too few pixels per inch, then the pixels will be very large and you will get a very pixelated image (jagged edges, you will actually see individual pixels, not good). You’ll hear various different numbers thrown around as to what an acceptable PPI for a print-out is. A lot of this will depend on the size of the print. This is because you look at large prints from a further distance than a small print, so you can get away with a lower PPI and still have the image look fine.

All that PPI does is affect the print size of the image. There are 2 ways that you can change the print size, by resampling or by not resampling. Not resampling is what you normally want to do, this will only change the size of the print. Using resampling will actually change the number of pixels (and thus the file size) in order to match the print size. So for instance, if you don’t resample, changing the PPI setting will increase or decrease the print size (it will increase if you drop the PPI, it will decrease if you increase the PPI). With resampling, if you change the PPI, you will loose pixels (if you set the PPI to a lower value) or you will have pixels created (if you increase the PPI). Creating pixels is a bad idea, they get generated by the computer and the results aren’t usually that good. Throwing away pixels is fine as long as you won’t need the bigger size later (that’s why it’s usually a good idea to save the original large file).

An Example

Suppose you have a 100 x 100 pixel image, it could be printed at many different sizes. If you set the image to print at 10 PPI, then you’d have a 10″ x 10″ image. If you set the image to print at 100 PPI, you’d have a 1″ x 1″ image. Note that adjusting this value doesn’t effect the number of pixels in the image at all, it just changes how big the print will be.

Take our 100 x 100 pixel image again. Suppose it’s set at 100 PPI (producing the same 1″ x 1″ printed image). With re-sampling off, when you adjust the PPI the dimensions adjust as well, this is how things worked in the example above. With re-sampling on, the dimensions won’t change. So, if you changed the PPI to 10 with re-sampling on, you would still keep a 1″ x 1″ image and the computer would throw out pixels to make the image stay that size. So in this case, you’d end up with a 10 x 10 pixel image in the end. If you went the other way, and changed the PPI to 300, then the computer would generate pixels to make a 300 x 300 pixel image that’s still 1″ x 1″ when printed.

Usually, the only reason you want to use re-sampling is for reducing the size of your image. For example, my scanner produces 3888 x 2592 images. These images are too big to use online (both for display and because of file size). By using re-sampling, I can adjust the size of the images to something more appropriate for online use.

DPI

Now let’s talk about DPI. DPI only refers to the printer. Every pixel output is made up of different coloured inks (usually 4-6 colours, although many printers use more now). Because of the small number of colours, the printer needs to be able to mix these inks to make up all the colours of the image. So each pixel of the image is created by a series of tiny dots (you could think of them as sub-pixels). Generally, the higher the DPI, the better the tonality of the image, colours should look better and blends between colours should be smoother. You’ll also use more ink and the print job will be slower. You might want to try setting your printer to a lower DPI to save ink and speed up the job, see if you notice any difference in quality. The lowest setting where you don’t see any loss in quality should be the best one to use.

So a 1200 dpi printer uses 1200 dots of ink in every inch to make up the colours. If you were printing a 300 PPI image, then every pixel would be made up of 16 smaller ink dots (1200 DPI x 1200 DPI / 300 PPI x 300 PPI). A lower DPI would have fewer ink dots making up each pixel, which would make the colour look worse. A higher DPI would have more ink dots for each pixel and should give more accurate colour (especially under close examination).
Membership scheme now available - Just £10 per year - Regular Supplier Discounts and Special Offers!
(contact Admin for more details)
avfcvillan
Posts: 14
Joined: 07 Jun 2011, 22:17
Contact:

Re: Ready to start mug smashing!

Post by avfcvillan »

Right guys, firstly..............................THANK YOU!

Martin, school boy error on my part! I had downloaded the Sawgrass profile and not realised there was setup documentation. Followed all there info and used Pauls test template (top job by the way) and with fingers crossed I pressed a mug.

Spot on, everything is now as it should be. If any newbies are reading this post then please learn from my mistakes.......

DO NOT BUY CHEAP!

Buy from a reputable supplier.

Buy supported products and consumables.

And one thing I didn't make a mistake in, was that I LISTENED to the advice that I was given by very knowledgable ppl on this forum.

Again, THANK YOU!

Well I won't be cutting and running I plan to stay around and participate as much as I can(if you'll have me....lol)

Neil (no longer mug smashing!)
User avatar
Paul
Posts: 8557
Joined: 28 Sep 2009, 05:00
Contact:

Re: Ready to start mug smashing!

Post by Paul »

lol! good to know everything is fine now ;) :tongue:
http://www.howtoprintstuff.co.uk <-- How To Print Stuff BLOG
John G
Posts: 3008
Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 05:00
Contact:

Re: Ready to start mug smashing!

Post by John G »

Glad you got it sorted Neil, there'll be no stopping you now!
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests