Galaxy Neptune or Stahls Clam Basic?

This is the place to talk about Heat Presses
pw66
Posts: 1314
Joined: 05 Nov 2015, 22:59
Contact:

Re: Galaxy Neptune or Stahls Clam Basic?

Post by pw66 »

Daninho;142226 wrote:Stahls Europe in germany. Some parts need high pressure, i will avoid those high pressure parts in the future.
So Stahls Europe have stated that their Basic range are not suitable for sublimation?
What are they suitable for - sublimation uses far less pressure than HTV or other transfers.

I hope Stahls stockist know that the basic presses they are selling (according to the European distributor) are not fit for the use for which they have been sold.:biggrin::biggrin:
Daninho
Posts: 134
Joined: 29 Nov 2019, 19:01
Contact:

Re: Galaxy Neptune or Stahls Clam Basic?

Post by Daninho »

pw66;142228 wrote:So Stahls Europe have stated that their Basic range are not suitable for sublimation?
What are they suitable for - sublimation uses far less pressure than HTV or other transfers.

I hope Stahls stockist know that the basic presses they are selling are ( according to the European distributor) are not fit for the use for which they have been sold.:biggrin::biggrin:
No they said it is not suited for high pressure and only usable for fabrics, not metal plates etc... . I said that you need high pressure for some sublimation stuff.
I asked them because i had a problem with my teflon protection for the bottom plate. It was a nightmare to put on and it was wrinkled like hell after it arrived and i paid 70 Euro for that little piece but its obviously normal. In the bedinning i thought they send the wrong size because it looked impossible to fit on my 40x50 plate but obviously you had to stretch it like hell to fit. I was worried about ripping it apart.

on that occasion i asked them about your problem with the heating plate because i thought that could happen to me as well in the future.

My press is actually in the cellar in the "washing room" :)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]6082[/ATTACH]
Attachments
vB_ID:6082
vB_ID:6082
IMG_3473.JPG (53.36 KiB) Not viewed yet
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest